An Artistic Voyage East of the Pacific: The Carter Examines the Impact of Asian American Art in its Newest Exhibition to its History

Known for its stellar collection of American art, the Amon Carter Museum in Fort Worth is expanding the definition of what art and artists from the United States could be.

In its latest show, East of the Pacific: Making Histories of Asian American Art (May 18-Nov. 30), the institution offers a distilled look at the work of over 32 artists from the mid-19th century through the present day. Including ceramics, drawings, paintings, photographs, and prints, the exhibition is a more edited version of a collection drawn from the Cantor Arts Center at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California.

Originally curated by Aleesa Pitchamarn Alexander (Stanford’s Robert M. and Ruth L. Halperin Associate Curator of Modern and Contemporary Art and Co-Director of the Asian American Art Initiative), the exhibition served as the inaugural show of the initiative and came about from a fortuitous acquisition of a San Franciscan patron’s private collection.

“One of the reasons we co-founded the AAAI at Stanford was because of the long history of Asian American presence in the Bay Area,” says Alexander. “We acquired a significant amount of work from art dealer and collector Michael Brown, who had spent a lot of his life gathering work from artists of Asian descent living and working in California. The exhibition came out of looking at the different types of stories these objects could tell.”

Brown, an inveterate collector who dealt primarily with Asian American and Asian artists, possessed many hundreds of artworks—141 of which were acquired by the Cantor in 2020. A significant portion of these ultimately ended up in the show, which made its debut at Stanford in the fall of 2022. As Chinese laborers built the institution, it was the ideal setting for a narrative of American art that shared its history with the very foundation of the university.

“It wasn’t just for Stanford,” Alexander emphasizes. “It was for a Bay Area audience who are familiar with San Francisco’s Chinatown. It’s the oldest Chinatown in America, and a lot of these artists were based here. I was making sure I made these stories accessible to people who are familiar with our history.”

The curator’s initial goal was expanding public awareness, citing the lack of Asian American museum collections across the country. Tailored to a more academically inclined audience, Alexander initially divided “East of the Pacific” into six thematic sections, arranged “vaguely chronologically.”

First, she examined “discreet points of contact from 19th-century immigration history, beginning when Japan opened itself for trade, which allowed artists to go back and forth across the Pacific, and an early influx of Chinese immigrants to the United States.”

The second section deals with an early 20th-century collective of Japanese and Chinese artists who worked alongside artists of European descent to bring their cultures together, while the third section highlighted the lively, impactful community found in Chinatown.

Perhaps the most powerful gallery explored citizens placed in Japanese-American camps during World War II and the artists working within them. The fifth had a selection of nonrepresentational works to rival the more obvious white male figures of the abstract expressionist movement, such as Pollock and Rothko.

Finally, the last section reflects on the 1976 exhibition“Other Sources: An American Essay” mounted on the occasion of the Bicentennial at the San Francisco Art Institute. Creating a new canon of art to juxtapose the white Western canon, it included blue chip names like modernist sculptor Ruth Asawa.

Staged at the Carter in a smaller format with 48 objects and wall text tailored to a more general audience less familiar with California art and history, it builds on the Fort Worth museum’s mission to widen the boundaries of what viewers perceive as “American art.”

As the Carter is the only venue outside of San Francisco to stage East of the Pacific, the work it highlights is exemplary of the museum’s mission, according to Michaela Haffner, the museum’s assistant curator of painting, sculptures, and works on paper.

“In the past few years, we’ve been trying to make a commitment to show artists of Asian descent,” she says. “It’s a general interest in broadening the story of American art through…artists of color in general. We’ve been around since 1961, and while we have a robust collection depicting the American West, we want to build our collection of artists that have been marginalized—not only staging these experiences that are wonderful but at the end, ephemeral, but making that commitment through acquisition and collecting. I don’t think it’s a change of course in any way but a real continued growth of our collection and an expansion of what American art means.”

Haffner feels that aligning the Trans-Pacific story with the conquering of the American West, so often depicted in Carter’s permanent collection, will make perfect sense to even the most casual of art lovers.

“The Trans-Pacific context is one of migration and immigration, and the stories of what happened in the 19th and 20th century connect us as our state is also one of migration and immigration,” she says.

As programming at museums like the National Museum of African American History and Culture and the Women’s History Museum are currently under fire by our nation’s government, a show like East of the Pacific is more than just an attempt to fill a hole in the history of American art. Instead, it is a crucial retelling of the contributions and lasting impact of Asian American artists, one that any supporter of American art should be duty-bound to see.

“It would have made a huge difference to me as a young art history student to see an exhibition like this, so I hope (this show) can be that opportunity for someone else,” says Alexander, “Frankly to just be able to get the work out there is a huge battle and an important piece of the puzzle when it comes to telling a more diverse, inclusive, and, importantly, accurate history of American art.”

—KENDALL MORGAN